Selasa, 21 Juni 2022

NASA's Artemis 1 moon mission passes crucial fueling test despite leak - Space.com

NASA's Artemis 1 moon mission completed a crucial preflight milestone today (June 20), wrapping up a two-day set of tests known as a wet dress rehearsal. 

Those tests included fueling up Artemis 1's huge Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and performing a simulated countdown that took the vehicle and NASA's Orion capsule through most of the progressions they would endure on launch day before engine ignition. The simulated countdown reached its conclusion at 7:37 p.m. EDT (2337 GMT), bringing an end to the wet dress.

Not everything went perfectly smoothly. The Artemis 1 team noticed a hydrogen leak during fueling today, and they intentionally "masked" data associated with the issue to let the countdown continue. (During an actual launch countdown, such data would have raised red flags, NASA officials said.) This change meant the countdown was halted at T-29 seconds before "liftoff," instead of T-9 seconds as originally planned.

Related: NASA's Artemis 1 moon mission explained in photos

But that hiccup didn't dampen the enthusiasm of the Artemis 1 team much.

"It's a great day for our team," Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, Artemis launch director with the Exploration Ground Systems Program at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, said during a webcast of the wet dress just after it wrapped up. "Really proud of them working through the loading operations and working through terminal count."

Ground teams at KSC will now likely spend the next few days preparing the Artemis 1 stack and mobile launch platform (MLP) for transport from Launch Pad 39B to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), where technicians will analyze results from the series of tests. 

The wet dress was the final major milestone that Artemis 1 needed to complete before launch. On the actual mission, the SLS rocket will launch an uncrewed Orion on a roughly month-long journey to the moon and back. Artemis 1 will be the first in a series of expeditions to the moon that NASA hopes lay the foundation for a permanent human presence on the lunar surface — one of the chief goals of the agency's Artemis program. 

Artemis 1 will be the first flight for the SLS, the realization of over a decade of research, development and manufacturing to advance NASA's human exploration plans beyond low Earth orbit (LEO). If Artemis 1 goes well, NASA plans to fly astronauts aboard Artemis 2 and Artemis 3, with the latter mission putting astronauts down on the moon in four years or so.

Agency officials have repeatedly voiced optimism for an Artemis 1 launch at the end of August, but those hopes always hinged on a smooth wet dress rehearsal. Now, that launch window seems much closer to reality.

Procedures on the rocket and MLP systems at Pad 39B began on Saturday (June 18) with a call to stations for ground teams at 5:00 p.m. EDT (2100 GMT). That kicked off a countdown clock toward a simulated launch time of 2:40 p.m. EDT (1840 GMT) today, which was later pushed back to 4:38 p.m. EDT (2038 GMT). 

True to its name, one of the first major protocols for the SLS wet dress rehearsal was filling the water tanks for the pad's sound suppression infrastructure. The system dumps nearly half a million gallons (1.9 million liters) of water onto the launch pad and flame trenches during an actual liftoff and works to absorb acoustic energy expelled from engine ignition.

Next in the process came vehicle stage startups. Operators began that on Saturday night, powering on Orion's systems first. The SLS core stage was powered up next, early on Sunday morning (June 19), followed by a series of systems checks to confirm connections between the spacecraft, ground infrastructure and boards in mission control.

With the rocket's first-stage systems active, final preparations for the vehicle's four RS-25 engines completed their own set of inspections and tests, which wrapped up on Sunday morning.

NASA officials met Sunday to assess rehearsal progress and receive a weather briefing from meteorologists with the U.S. Space Force Space Launch Delta 45, which predicted favorable weather conditions for today's tanking procedures. In an official blog post, NASA stated that ground crews on Sunday afternoon were "performing a pre-launch walk down of the rocket to ensure the Space Launch System is prepared for the upcoming propellant loading operations."

Burning the midnight oil, so to speak, teams at NASA switched on power to the SLS upper stage, known as the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS), just before 2:00 a.m. EDT (0600 GMT) today. By 2:40 a.m. (0640 GMT), all non-essential personnel were cleared from the launch pad.

Artemis 1 made its full-stack debut in mid-March, when the vehicle and the MLP first rolled from the VAB to the pad for a wet dress rehearsal that began on April 1. But technicians encountered problems during that try; three separate attempts to complete the wet dress were scrubbed due to complications during SLS fueling operations. 

Related: NASA's new moon rocket spotted from space rolling to the launch pad (photos)

The Artemis 1 team rolled the Artemis 1 stack back to the VAB on April 25, then spent about a month making repairs and upgrades to pave the way for another wet dress try. Loading failures during the first wet dress put a predominant focus on those systems during this morning's cryogenic fueling procedures. 

A built-in countdown hold went into effect early this morning and was expected to last 1.5 hours. During that time, mission managers conducted weather and vehicle tanking briefings and had originally received a "go" from Blackwell-Thompson, but the hold was extended when operators encountered an issue with a supply valve in Pad 39B's redundant gaseous nitrogen system. According to Derrol Nail, NASA spokesperson on the agency's live broadcast for the wet dress, the valve "would not close," though the malfunction was "not with the actual valve itself, but with the controller."

Technicians were not immediately able to determine the cause of the issue, but they replaced the valve nonetheless. The affected gaseous nitrogen line was initially designated as the pad's redundant supply. However, after replacing the valve, engineers reassigned that leg for primary use and the unaffected line as the new backup. "The manual retest of that valve is working well, according to the team that's out there," Nail said during the broadcast. 

Gaseous nitrogen is used at Pad 39B for purging the fuel tanks, umbilicals and other cavities inside SLS, both before and after tanking. Artemis 1's time back in the VAB following the first wet dress attempt allowed some planned upgrades at the pad to move forward ahead of schedule. One of these upgrades included the enhancement of supply capabilities for the pad's gaseous nitrogen, which nearly doubled in capacity.

"We did go through and do a test to verify that [the gaseous nitrogen upgrades] supported all of our needs prior to rollout," Blackwell-Thompson told Space.com during a June 15 press call. "We went through all of the flow profiles, verified all of the pressures and also verified all the timelines with some amount of margin to ensure that our flow rates and our needs could be supported during our wet dress rehearsal."

Assistant launch director Jeremy Graeber joined the NASA broadcast for an update following the valve resolution, informing listeners that the "problem has been cleared, and we're at a good configuration to pick up with cryo-loading [and] no longer constrained." According to Nail, Blackwell-Thompson gave the "go" to move forward with the morning's cryogenic tanking procedures shortly before 9 a.m. (1300 GMT) today, and the count was resumed at 9:28 a.m. EDT (1300 GMT) toward an adjusted T-0 of 4:38 p.m. EDT (2038 GMT).

The two stages of the SLS rocket are fueled with liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (LH2). The process of loading both involves super-cooling the propellants and chilling associated hardware prior to tanking. Technicians monitor loading rates carefully, starting with a slow-fill flow, and increasing to peak flow rates once the umbilical connections and fuel tanks acclimate to the extreme cold temperatures. Once nearly full, transfers decrease to a "top-off" speed before switching to an even slower flow, commensurate with fuel boil-off leading up to umbilical disconnect and launch. 

Related: The history of rockets

LOX slow-fill loading for the SLS core stage began this morning at 10:08 a.m. (1408 GMT) and reached fast-fill flow rates fifteen minutes later. In what's known as the "aft strut constraint," which refers to stress put on the connection points for the bottom of the SLS's solid rocket boosters, according to Nail, the core stage LOX tank cannot fill past 49% until the LH2 tank's depletion sensors are completely covered. 

To accommodate for some of the morning's lost time, mission operators were able to speed up LH2 chill-down procedures for propellant and umbilical lines. This cooling also included vent valves for the ICPS, which experienced pressure spikes during the first Artemis 1 wet dress. Following that test, NASA technicians added these components to the chill-down procedures preceding LH2 fill for the core stage. 

Operators were able to begin the LH2 slow-fill by 10:42 a.m. EDT (1442 GMT). At 11:30 a.m. EDT (1530 GMT), once depletion sensors in the bottom of the tank were submerged, LH2 transfer rates were switched to fast-flow, putting both first-stage fuel tanks on track to reach the targeted T-0 at 4:38 p.m. EDT (2038 GMT). 

Though the core stage LH2 tank is the rocket’s largest — coming in at 537,000 gallons (2 million liters) — it was also the tank to be topped off first. The SLS core stage LH2 transfer began its boil-off replenishment flow at 12:42 p.m. (1642 GMT), allowing operators to begin LH2 cooling for the ICPS about 20 minutes later.

The first stage LOX tank holds 196,000 gallons (740,000 liters) — less than half the volume of the LH2 tank —but the vehicle’s liquid oxygen is far denser than its liquid hydrogen catalytic counterpart, and takes much longer to load.

The core stage LOX tank was topped off and began its boil-off replenishing flow at 1:30 p.m. EDT (1730 GMT). At the same time, operators began fast-fill loading for the upper stage LH2 tank. 

However, Nail reported on the NASA broadcast that operators had encountered data indicating a hydrogen leak in the core stage tail service mast umbilical bleed line quick disconnect, a point where a line connecting the SLS and MLP are designed to separate during launch.

"The hydrogen bleed for the kickstart was halted when there was a leak detected at the quick disconnect for the core stage hydrogen," Nail said. 

Related: Every mission to the moon

Related stories:

The Artemis 1 team spent some time troubleshooting the issue. For example, technicians warmed up and then cooled down the quick disconnect, trying to reseat the seal. That didn't fix the leak, but the team ultimately decided to press ahead with the wet dress anyway.

The leak, and the attempts to fix it, ended up pushing the end of the wet dress back about three hours. And it also changed procedures for "terminal count," the final 10 minutes of the simulated countdown, which marked the end of the test. Terminal count ended at T-29 seconds, as noted above, and the team had to "mask" data associated with the leak so the launch computer couldn't see it and trigger a hold. But everything went through to its modified conclusion.

"During the terminal count, the teams performed several critical operations that must be accomplished for launch, including switching control from the ground launch sequencer to the automated launch sequencer controlled by the rocket’s flight software, an important step that the team wanted to accomplish," NASA officials wrote in an update tonight (opens in new tab).

 The Artemis 1 team will now spend some time figuring out just how those operations went.

"Like any tests we run, we'll go take the data," Blackwell-Thompson said. "We'll go look at what we got. We'll go look at the couple of things that we didn't get. And we'll lay out a plan for how we go forward."

NASA has published a list of possible launch windows for Artemis 1 that extend through June 2023. Earlier versions of that schedule included a window as soon as next month, but NASA officials have repeatedly stressed the improbability of a July launch. An updated schedule was added to NASA's website on June 17, which removes July as an option. 

The soonest that SLS can launch is likely Aug. 23, but that date is designated for a "short mission" on the schedule. NASA has categorized launch windows based on the alignment of various mission parameters influenced by the moon's orbital position. Windows are divided between long and short mission durations, which amount to 38 to 42 days and 26 to 28 days, respectively. 

If checks in the VAB go smoothly, it's possible NASA will target the schedule's earliest long mission opportunity, which would kick off with a launch on Aug. 29. However, a long mission window lasting five consecutive days exists between Sept. 2 and Sept. 6, and may serve as a more favorable option. In any case, NASA officials are not likely to commit to a launch date prior to SLS inspections in the VAB, which won't begin until later this month. 

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom (opens in new tab) or on Facebook (opens in new tab).

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiR2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNwYWNlLmNvbS9hcnRlbWlzLTEtbW9vbi1yb2NrZXQtd2V0LWRyZXNzLXJlaGVhcnNhbC1zdWNjZXNz0gEA?oc=5

2022-06-21 03:51:25Z
1470325919

Mars rover makes an unexpected, trivial discovery - electriccitymagazine.ca


(Reporter)
Earthlings are officially scattered on another planet, and it’s spreading in unexpected ways. for every guardian, The Perseverance Mars probe captured an image of a shiny, foil-like object stuck between two rocks. It’s definitely a sign of life, but it’s not the kind that perseverance hopes to find in its mission. on it Twitter Her first-person pronoun-perseverance account said “It’s a piece of a thermal blanket…maybe it came from my descent stage, the rocket-powered jet pack that dropped me on landing day in 2021.” The blanket fluttered to its current position during the descent or was subsequently blown away by the Martian winds. according to The New York Times , Blanket scrap is far from the only “other world wreck” on the planet’s surface. Earlier this year, the Ingenuity helicopter, Perseverance’s “little robotic companion” spotted the upper part of the lander, or the rear shell, which protects the rest of the craft as it descends. Lying about a mile from where Perseverance landed, I crashed with the help of Skycrane.

The guardian The discovery, he says, “rekindled fears that space exploration threatens to pollute pristine Martian and lunar environments,” an issue addressed by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which some say does not go far enough to protect space environments. However, according to one expert, the risk of contamination is low because “everything is sterilized before it goes to Mars”. for every Mashable The rover hasn’t had “time to admire the litter” as it is now heading to its “peak of mission”, exploring a long-dry river delta at Jezero Crater, which may have been an aquatic environment capable of supporting microbial life about 3 billion years ago. (Read more perseverance stories.)

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmVsZWN0cmljY2l0eW1hZ2F6aW5lLmNhL21hcnMtcm92ZXItbWFrZXMtYW4tdW5leHBlY3RlZC10cml2aWFsLWRpc2NvdmVyeS_SAQA?oc=5

2022-06-21 05:18:05Z
CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmVsZWN0cmljY2l0eW1hZ2F6aW5lLmNhL21hcnMtcm92ZXItbWFrZXMtYW4tdW5leHBlY3RlZC10cml2aWFsLWRpc2NvdmVyeS_SAQA

Senin, 20 Juni 2022

A way to keep objects levitated by sound from falling due to interference - Phys.org

A way to keep objects levitated by sound from falling due to interference
Real-time acoustic holography with arbitrary scattering surfaces. (A) Schematical concept of our acoustic holographic technique that can create multiple levitation traps in the presence of sound-scattering physical objects. Pmax represents the maximum amplitude of the pressure in the sound field. (B) Experimental example of our technique that can levitate four particles with a projection screen (i.e., a piece of light fabric), demonstrating an MR display that creates digital content in the presence of a 3D-printed physical object. The high computational rates of our approach enable the digital content to be interactive to user inputs (i.e., the levitated screen moves according to the keyboard input). Credit: Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7614

A team of researchers at University College London has developed a way to keep objects levitated by sound waves airborne when other objects interfere with the levitation path. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, the group describes their self-correcting levitation system.

Prior research has shown that it is possible to levitate objects by firing sound waves at them. Because sound waves are nothing more than air particles moving together in a certain way, the object being levitated will fall if an object interferes with the sound waves. In this new effort, the researchers developed new features to address this problem.

Credit: Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7614

To protect the sound waves from , the researchers increased the number of used—in their work, they used 256. They also added software to control each of the speakers. The speakers were arranged in a grid and objects were levitated by specifically shaped sound waves. By programming the speakers in specific ways, the team was able to get the system to work together to keep an object above the in the air despite interruptions. If some of the waves were blocked, other were redirected to take their place.

The researchers proved their system was viable by testing it using a 3D-printed white rabbit as an interference object. Objects were levitated around the rabbit regardless of its location. In one experiment, the researchers levitated beads around the rabbit that formed into a flying butterfly. They also levitated a piece of clear fabric that they used as a screen for projection of the rabbit they had printed. And they levitated a single drop of water over a glass of water, showing that their system would work even when the interfering object was a jiggling glass of liquid.

This video shows the creation of a butterfly flapping around a 3D-printed bunny, which can be controlled by hand gestures. Credit: Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7614

The researchers suggest their system could be used for demonstration purposes, such as in museums or advertisements. They next plan to expand their system to allow it to handle multiple interfering objects at the same time.


Explore further

Using sound waves to model the rotational dynamics of inertial many-particle clustering objects

More information: Ryuji Hirayama et al, High-speed acoustic holography with arbitrary scattering objects, Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7614

© 2022 Science X Network

Citation: A way to keep objects levitated by sound from falling due to interference (2022, June 20) retrieved 20 June 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-06-levitated-falling-due.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiOGh0dHBzOi8vcGh5cy5vcmcvbmV3cy8yMDIyLTA2LWxldml0YXRlZC1mYWxsaW5nLWR1ZS5odG1s0gEA?oc=5

2022-06-20 13:19:29Z
1473395804

How the Earth’s continents were assembled? - Tech Explorist

Accurate spatial models of tectonic plates and geological terranes are essential for analyzing and interpreting a wide variety of geoscientific data and developing compositional and physical models of the lithosphere. In a new study, scientists at the Universities of Adelaide, Tasmania, Nevada-Reno, and Geoscience Australia, created new models for tectonic plates that offer fresh insights into the history of the Earth.

The models show how the continents were assembled. Compared to existing models, it improves the correlation between an observed earthquake and volcano occurrences within deformation zones and microplates.

Dr. Derrick Hasterok, Lecturer, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, who led the team that produced the new models, said, “We looked at the current knowledge of the configuration of plate boundary zones and the past construction of the continental crust.”

“The continents were assembled a few pieces at a time, a bit like a jigsaw, but each time the puzzle was finished, it was cut up and reorganized to produce a new picture. Our study helps illuminate the various components so geologists can piece together the previous images.”

“We found that plate boundary zones account for nearly 16 percent of the Earth’s crust and an even higher proportion, 27 percent, of continents.”

“Our new model for tectonic plates better explains the spatial distribution of 90 percent of earthquakes and 80 percent of volcanoes from the past two million years whereas existing models only capture 65 percent of earthquakes.”

Scientists created three new geological models: a plate model, a province model, and an orogeny model.

26 orogenies (mountain-building processes) have left their mark on the crust’s current architecture. Many, but not all, of these are connected to the creation of supercontinents. This new work allows scientists to map tectonic plates and the formation of continents.

The Macquarie microplate, located south of Tasmania, and the Capricorn microplate, which separates the Indian and Australian plates, are among the additional microplates in the revised plate model. Other data (precise) was added to further enrich the model about the boundaries of deformation zones: previous models showed these as discrete areas rather than broad zones.

Dr. Hasterok said, “The biggest changes to the plate model have been in western North America, which often has the boundary with the Pacific Plate drawn as the San Andreas and Queen Charlotte Faults. But the newly delineated boundary is much wider, approximately 1500 km, than the previously drawn narrow zone.”

“The other large change is in central Asia. The new model now includes all the deformation zones north of India as the plate bulldozes its way into Eurasia.”

“Our new model for tectonic plates better explains the spatial distribution of 90 percent of earthquakes and 80 percent of volcanoes from the past two million years whereas existing models only capture 65 percent of earthquakes.”

“The plate model can be used to improve models of risks from geohazards; the orogeny model helps understand the geodynamic systems and better model Earth’s evolution, and the province model can be used to improve prospecting for minerals.”

Journal Reference:

  1. Derrick Hasterok et al. New Maps of Global Geological Provinces and Tectonic Plates. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104069

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiRGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlY2hleHBsb3Jpc3QuY29tL2hvdy1lYXJ0aHMtY29udGluZW50cy1hc3NlbWJsZWQvNDgyOTEv0gEA?oc=5

2022-06-20 06:02:22Z
1468659315

Minggu, 19 Juni 2022

Industrial Processes Absolutely Need These Basic Tools To Operate - BBN Times

Industrial Processes Absolutely Need These Basic Tools To Operate

No matter what industry you work in, there are some basic tools that are absolutely necessary for operations.

If you are in charge of industrial processes, it is crucial to have these tools on hand at all times. In this article, we will discuss the most important basic tools for industrial processes. Stay safe and productive by making sure you have these items in your workshop!

Vane_Pumps_Are_a_Must.jpeg

1) Vane Pumps Are a Must

If you need to move fluids around in your industrial process, vane pumps are an absolute necessity. Vane pumps work by using vanes to pressurize and transfer fluid. They are incredibly versatile and can be used for a variety of applications. Make sure you have a few vane pumps on hand at all times so that you can keep your process running smoothly. Some of the types of vane pump are single vane pumps, double vane pumps, and external gear pumps. Single vane pumps are the most common type of vane pump, and they are typically used for general purpose applications. Double vane pumps are designed for high-pressure applications, and external gear pumps are used for very viscous fluids. 

Also, be sure to get a vane pump that is compatible with the fluids you are using in your process. For example, if you are using a corrosive fluid, make sure to get a stainless steel vane pump. Or, if you are using a flammable fluid, make sure to get an explosion-proof vane pump.

2) Tubing and Hoses Are Important, Too!

In addition to vane pumps, tubing and hoses are also crucial for many industrial processes. Tubing is used to transport fluids and gases from one place to another. Hoses are used to connect different pieces of equipment together. Make sure you have a variety of tubing and hoses on hand so that you can transport fluids and gases safely and efficiently. Some types of tubing include PVC tubing, stainless steel tubing, and PTFE tubing. Some types of hoses include braided hose, spiral hose, and layflat hose.

PVC tubing is a type of tubing that is made from polyvinyl chloride. It is often used in applications where corrosion resistance is not required. Stainless steel tubing is a type of tubing that is made from stainless steel. It is often used in applications where corrosion resistance is required. PTFE tubing is a type of tubing that is made from polytetrafluoroethylene. It is often used in applications where chemical resistance is required. 

Braided hose is a type of hose that has a braided outer layer. It is often used in applications where high pressure is required. Spiral hose is a type of hose that has a spiral outer layer. It is often used in applications where high flexibility is required. Layflat hose is a type of hose that is very flat. It is often used in applications where space is limited.

3) Sensors Are Also Important

 

In order to properly monitor your industrial process, sensors are absolutely essential. Sensors can measure a variety of parameters, such as temperature, pressure, and level. By having sensors in place, you can be sure that your process is running safely and effectively. Plus, if something does go wrong, you will be able to detect it quickly and take corrective action.

4)  Actuators Are Necessary for Automation

If you want to automate your industrial process, actuators are a must. Actuators are devices that convert energy into motion. They can be used to open and close valves, move slides, and operate switches. By having actuators in your process, you can significantly improve efficiency and safety. For example, if you are using sensors to monitor a process, you can use actuators to automatically shut down the process if something goes wrong. Or, if you want to automate the loading and unloading of materials, actuators can be used to move slides or conveyors.

5)  Don't Forget About Safety Equipment! 

Safety_Equipment_at_Work.jpeg

Last but not least, it is important to have proper safety equipment on hand. This includes items like fire extinguishers, first aid kits, and safety glasses. By having this equipment readily available, you can help to prevent accidents and injuries. Plus, if an accident does occur, you will be prepared to handle it quickly and effectively.

Industrial processes are absolutely essential for many businesses. If you are in charge of an industrial process, make sure you have the necessary tools on hand at all times. By having the right tools, you can help to ensure that your process is safe, efficient, and productive. These are just a few of the most important tools for industrial processes. Make sure you have these items on hand at all times so that you can keep your process running smoothly. Stay safe and productive!

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJibnRpbWVzLmNvbS9jb21wYW5pZXMvaW5kdXN0cmlhbC1wcm9jZXNzZXMtYWJzb2x1dGVseS1uZWVkLXRoZXNlLWJhc2ljLXRvb2xzLXRvLW9wZXJhdGXSAQA?oc=5

2022-06-19 09:37:46Z
CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJibnRpbWVzLmNvbS9jb21wYW5pZXMvaW5kdXN0cmlhbC1wcm9jZXNzZXMtYWJzb2x1dGVseS1uZWVkLXRoZXNlLWJhc2ljLXRvb2xzLXRvLW9wZXJhdGXSAQA

Mars rover Perseverance discovers human trash. What happened? - Deseret News

NASA’s Mars rover, Perseverance, has been on the planet since last year with the purpose of finding signs of life. However, NASA tweeted that the rover has come across something unexpected: human garbage.

What is it? The trash is reportedly a piece of a thermal blanket used to protect the rover from extreme conditions upon landing, according to Business Insider.

How did it get there? NASA scientists are unsure how the trash got to where it is.

  • A post on the rover’s Facebook page reads, “It’s a surprise finding this here because my descent stage crashed about 2 km away. Did this piece land here after that, or was it blown here by the wind?”

A history of space junk: This isn’t the first time human litter has been spotted on Mars.

  • On April 19, a piece of the rover’s parachute and backshell were spotted on the red planet, according to Space.com.

Criticism: People on social media were quick to respond to the litter found on Mars, the Miami Herald reported.

  • One commenter on NASA’s Facebook post wrote, “I guess it will not be long until we start seeing soda bottles, discarded fast food packaging and plastic litter on Mars. Maybe we need to send a robot with a broom to start tidying up already.”
  • Another commenter wrote, “How to pollute without physically (being) in a place: that’s another level.”
  • “Just because humans don’t like scraps and debris, doesn’t mean the Martians hate it too. We know nothing about them. They could eat pollution for all we know,” another commenter joked.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiX2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRlc2VyZXQuY29tLzIwMjIvNi8xOC8yMzE3MTY3MS9tYXJzLXJvdmVyLXBlcnNldmVyYW5jZS1uYXNhLXNwYWNlLWZpbmRzLWh1bWFuLXRyYXNo0gEA?oc=5

2022-06-18 18:00:00Z
CAIiEKPsE0-vdvkPc8ZRq-x0VAAqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4P_3CjD_3tgCMO2B7wU

About the usefulness of anomalies in science - Vaughan Today

“In the clear blue sky of physics, two little clouds of incomprehension remained on the horizon that obscured beauty and clarity. (“Knowledge in physics is like the great blue sky, which remains on the horizon only two little clouds of incomprehension.”) These famous words were uttered, In 1900, by the great British physicist Lord Kelvin – the creator of the “absolute zero”, from which the temperatures bearing his name are calculated – in front of his peers at the Royal Institution of London.

These two “little clouds” were, one, an inconclusive result of the Michelson and Morley experiment, which failed to show a discrepancy in the speed of light propagation in space, and the other, a problem posed by the so-called “black”. body’ emitted from an object heated to a high temperature. Lord Kelvin believed that there was an anomaly in the details, as there was nothing new to discover in physics, after Newton’s universal gravity and Maxwell’s electromagnetism, only the measurements to be revised.

From clouds to devastating storms

However … behind the first of these two clouds was no less than the theory of relativity, behind the second quantum mechanics! Consider the two main theories on which twentieth century physics was built.e century which radically changed our view of concepts as fundamental as time, space, matter or energy. This often-reported anecdote can be the starting point for the new article of the philosopher and astrophysicist Aurélien Barrau, devoted precisely to these small anomalies, which sometimes make us jump from one model to another.

More than a century after Lord Kelvin, the situation in this regard has not fundamentally changed. Organized around “standard models” (particles for the infinitesimal, cosmology for the infinitesimally large, etc.), contemporary physics also faces its share of deviations. It also has two – or three or four… – “little clouds”, at least some of which (but which ones?) will sooner or later end up exploding in destructive storms, which puts forward our most solid theories. And Aurélien Barrau explains to us that it will always be so… and for this reason, he warns us from the start, “Literally, all theories are wrong”!

cosmic anomaly

by Aurelien Barrau. Donod Editions, 192 pages, €16.90 (published 7 September).

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZhdWdoYW50b2RheS5jYS9hYm91dC10aGUtdXNlZnVsbmVzcy1vZi1hbm9tYWxpZXMtaW4tc2NpZW5jZS_SAQA?oc=5

2022-06-19 06:48:38Z
CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZhdWdoYW50b2RheS5jYS9hYm91dC10aGUtdXNlZnVsbmVzcy1vZi1hbm9tYWxpZXMtaW4tc2NpZW5jZS_SAQA